Legal Opinion

Williams v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1923No. 8 Div. 508PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is for redemption of lands from mortgage foreclosure sale.

Thé equities of the bill were settled on former appeal from decree on demurrer. Williams v. Wilson, 205 Ala. 119, 87 South. 549. The court below dismissed the bill on the merits; hence this appeal.

Both parties claim through one Mac Smith, the common source of title.

Complainant,' Charlie Williams, claims by descent, and respondents, Jarne.s E. Wilson and others, by purchase at foreclosure sale under mortgage.

Respondents deny that Charlie Williams is a legitimate descendant and heir of Mac Smith, deceased. His legitimacy, vel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. HeinekeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Freeman v. BlountSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Weatherford v. WeatherfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  4. Prince v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Lay v. FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. CotnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Fuquay v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  4. Rogers v. McLeskeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Woodward Iron Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API