Legal Opinion

Austrian, Lance & Stewart, P. C. v. Hastings Properties, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1976PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Greenfield, J.

This is a motion for summary *26judgment in lieu of complaint upon a promissory note against the maker and a guarantor.

Plaintiff is a professional corporation of attorneys and styles its appearance in this action as pro se. Defendants object to the appearance citing CPLR 321 (subd [a]) as requiring that a corporation appear by attorney. This objection has prompted the attorney^ of the professional corporation to change their pro se appearance to one of appearing in behalf of the plaintiff professional corporation as attorneys.

Such a notice of appearance exalts form over substance. The fact of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. South Shore Securities Co. v. GoodeNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Costa Bonita Beach Resort Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
  2. Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones Y ValoresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Oahu Plumbing & Sheet Metal, Ltd. v. Kona Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Benito Muñoz, Inc. v. Productora Puertorriqueña de Alimentos, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1980
  5. Gilberg v. LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API