Legal Opinion
Whitt v. Lockheed Martin Utility Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 15, 2002No. C2-99-1065PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HOLSCHUH, District Judge.
Plaintiff James Whitt brought suit against his former employer, Lockheed Martin Utility Services, Inc., alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4112, age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) and Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4112, and wrongful discharge in violation of Ohio’s public policy. This matter is currently before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Record at 22).
I. Background
Lockheed Martin…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wiseman v. Whayne Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2004
- Yurasek v. Crossmark, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Rousselle v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007