Legal Opinion

Dahlin v. Frieborn

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 29, 2020No. 2:17-cv-02585Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES DAHLIN, et al., No. 2:17-cv-02585-MCE-AC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 14 ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Through the present action, Plaintiffs James and Kimberly Dahlin (the “Dahlins”), 18 and Toby and Martina Tippets (the “Tippets,” and collectively with the Dahlins, 19 “Plaintiffs”) assert eleven federal and state causes of action against various municipal 20 and non-municipal Defendants stemming from the seizure of various items and 57 dogs 21 from the Dahlins’ property,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API