Legal Opinion

Haptonstall v. Boomer Coal & Coke Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Fayette County. Action by M. L. Haptonstall against tlie Boomer Coal & Coke Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:

Plaintiff, an adult miner, employed in defendant’s coal mine, was injured in December, 1911, by a large piece of slate falling upon him from the roof of the mine in the entry where he was at work on a night shift. He sued and recovered a verdict and a judgment against defendant for five thousand dollars, which judgment is the subject of the present writ of error.

The declaration is in three counts. No effort was made on the trial to sustain by proof the second and third counts, but we think these counts good on demurrer and that the demurrer thereto was properly overruled. We are…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Simone v. . KirkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Gartin v. Draper Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Graham v. Newburg Orrel Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Pocahontas Colleries Co. v. Rukas' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. Goshorn v. Wheeling Mold & Foundry Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. AlexanderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Truman v. Wink-O Products Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kinder v. Boomer Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Strother v. United States Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Ward v. Liverpool Salt & Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API