Legal Opinion

Truman v. Wink-O Products Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1924PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, Judge:

In an action on the case the plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment of $1,000.00 against the defendant for injury sustained by her on account of the alleged negligent operation of its motor truck. The defendant brings error.

The plaintiff, about sixty years of age, residing on Young street, in the city of Charleston, maintains herself and invalid husband by doing laundry work. On July 22d, 1922, about seven o’clock a. m., while crossing Dryden street to deliver a bundle of laundry, carried in ber arms, she was struck and run over by defendant’s Ford motor truck, going south on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Deputy v. KimmellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Riedel v. Traction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Adamson's Administrator v. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1911
  4. Mullens v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Spencer's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chaney v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McLeod v. Charleston LaundryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State Road Commission v. BowlingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Virginia v. FlintWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Porterfield v. SudduthWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API