Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Andronica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 13, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeals from two decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 24, 2006 and September 11, 2006, which ruled, among other things, that claimant was ineligible to receive and was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed and had voluntarily left his employment without good cause, and charged him with a recoverable overpayment on the basis that he made willful misrepresentations to obtain benefits.

Claimant formed a corporation in November 2002 and served as its president and sole shareholder, deducting the business…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of LapczynskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of FascaldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Claim of BosticAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Pruzan v. LevineAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API