Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Bostic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeals (1) from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 15, 2000, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed May 2, 2001, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant filed for and received unemployment insurance benefits beginning in March 1998. He thereafter worked full *528time as an engineer for CRM Communications Corporation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FascaldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of AndronicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API