Legal Opinion
Pruzan v. Levine
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 28, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed without costs, provision granting petitioner Thomas B. Pruzan leave to file an action in Supreme Court for declaratory relief stricken, counterclaim by appellant Laurence A. Levine for judgment pursuant to the arbitration award reinstated, and that branch of appellant’s motion which sought summary judgment on this counterclaim granted.
Dissatisfied with the legal representation that he had received from petitioner Thomas B. Pruzan, appellant Laurence A. Levine filed a client request for fee arbitration pursuant to the Fee…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chase v. ScaliciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Polednak v. Country-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- D & Z Holding Corp. v. City of New York Department of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Parker, Clark Associates, Inc. v. ESM Data Systems, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981
- In re the Claim of AndronicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gold v. CrippenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Gold v. CrippenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Law Offs. of Thomas F. Liotti, LLC v. DavoudiaslAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017