Legal Opinion

Burgess v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 9, 2001No. 1999-CA-002262-MRPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHRODER, Judge.

This appeal questions whether the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress can apply to the conversion and slaughter of pet horses. We opine that the conduct of the offender rather than the subject of the conduct determines whether the conduct was outrageous. Hence, we affirm.

Judy Taylor (“Taylor”) was the owner of two registered Appaloosa horses, nicknamed Poco and P.J. Taylor had owned Poco for 14 years (since he was a foal) and P.J. for 13 years (since her birth). Taylor loved Poco and P.J. as if they were her “children.” Taylor and others…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Craft v. RiceKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. GolightlyKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Skaggs v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  5. Horton v. Union Light, Heat & Power Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Stringer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Plotnik v. MeihausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Kondaurov v. KerdashaSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  4. McDONALD'S CORP. v. OgbornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
  5. Smith v. Franklin CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API