Legal Opinion

United States v. McKinnie

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 28, 1989No. ACMR 8801151PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FOREMAN, Judge:

A general court-martial composed of officers and noncommissioned officers convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of two specifications of violating a general regulation by fraternizing with subordinates and two specifications of false swearing, in violation of Articles 92 and 134, of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for 120 days.

The appellant now contends that the military judge erred by (1) excluding exculpatory…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. Julio PiccinonnaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. GipsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. ScolesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. McKinnieUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. RodriguezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API