Legal Opinion

United States v. McKinnie

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 20, 1991No. 63,979; CM 8801151PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Senior Judge:

On May 18, 1988, appellant was tried at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, before a general court-martial with officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, they found him guilty of two specifications of violating a general regulation by fraternizing with several female trainees and of two specifications of false swearing by signing a false statement about the two instances of fraternization, in violation of Articles 92 and 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 892 and 934, respectively. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ScolesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. Art BernalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. McKinnieU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
  2. United States v. LovingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  4. United States v. GilletteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. AtheyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API