Legal Opinion

Clardy v. Royal Ins. Co. of America

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 22, 1986No. 85-317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by plaintiff, Thomas Eugene Clardy, from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendant, Royal Insurance Company of America ("Royal"). We reverse and remand.

Clardy was involved in an automobile accident with David Swierc on May 24, 1984. Swierc had automobile insurance with Royal. After the accident, Royal allegedly represented to Clardy that it would be responsible for the damage caused by Swierc to Clardy's vehicle. Royal also allegedly told Clardy not to have his vehicle repaired until a Royal agent could view it and that Royal would pay all rental charges on a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. DanielCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Pruitt v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. Strother v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Howton v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Hodge v. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Crick v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Hodge v. U.S. Fidelity and Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Nelson by and Through Nelson v. Alexsis, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API