In re Possible Recusal of Acker
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
On August 12, 1988, this judge conducted a hearing on the question of whether or not he should recuse himself in all or some of the government’s cases. The government did not show up for the hearing, but in response to the order issued on June 29, 1988, the government did file an enigmatic written response, which said:
The United States has at this time insufficient information to determine, and no reason to believe, that Judge Acker’s proposed general recusal is either necessary or appropriate. It is the United States’ view that the matter of recusal is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Amadeo v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K., Tokyo v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Theron ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Davis v. Board of School CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gun South, Inc. v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
- United States v. HayesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
- United States v. MoffettDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995