Legal Opinion

People v. Ames

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 1957No. Crim. 5677PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Convicted of having aborted nine 1 expectant mothers, defendants Ames and Haskin separately seek to upset the judgments on the grounds of (1) insufficiency of the evidence, and (2) errors in rulings at the trial.

Philip Ames is a licensed osteopathic physician and has practiced his profession in Los Angeles since 1943. He is a graduate in liberal arts from a popular university, and in osteopathy from a college dedicated to that school of thought. He took training at the Los Angeles College of Osteopathic Physicians and Surgeons and interned for a year at the Los Angeles County Hospital. From…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. BoylesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. GallardoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. EstradaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. SchaumloffelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. CarellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. State v. HooverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. People v. KutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API