Legal Opinion
Riverside County Department of Public Services v. B.S.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 17, 2009No. E045748PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
B.S., Sr. (the father), appeals from the juvenile court’s issuance of a restraining order under Welfare and Institutions Code section 213.5. The challenged order names his son, B.S., Jr. (B.S.)—the subject of this juvenile dependency proceeding—as a protected person, along with B.S.’s mother and *186maternal grandmother. The father contends that the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction to issue the order, because the criminal court had already issued a similar restraining order under Penal Code section 136.2. He further contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Colombo v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People Ex Rel. Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Plant Insulation Co. v. Fibreboard Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- In Re FarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. LombardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wanke, Industrial, Commercial, Residential, Inc. v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. G.Q.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Pedro M. (In re Bruno M.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. C.M. (In re A.M.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Garcia v. Escobar, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.