Colombo v. New York
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Despite a grant of immunity in response to the assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege not to be a witness against himself, petitioner refused to answer questions put to him before a Kings County, New York, grand jury. On December 7, 1965, a trial judge found that *10the questions put had been proper and directed petitioner to answer them. Petitioner refused; the trial court, after allowing petitioner a week’s time to change his mind, signed a commitment order stating that by “his contumacious and unlawful refusal after being sworn as a witness to answer any legal and proper interrogatories…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
3Cited by41 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. SammonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.