Legal Opinion

Colombo v. New York

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 22, 1972No. 71-352PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Per curiam

Despite a grant of immunity in response to the assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege not to be a witness against himself, petitioner refused to answer questions put to him before a Kings County, New York, grand jury. On December 7, 1965, a trial judge found that *10the questions put had been proper and directed petitioner to answer them. Petitioner refused; the trial court, after allowing petitioner a week’s time to change his mind, signed a commitment order stating that by “his contumacious and unlawful refusal after being sworn as a witness to answer any legal and proper interrogatories…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. SammonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API