Legal Opinion

In Re Farr

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1976No. Civ. 49141PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, J.

This proceeding was initiated by petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by William T. Farr to review an order of commitment made by Judge Older on August 6, 1974, imposing a sentence of five days imprisonment in the county jail and a fine of $500. Petitioner’s challenge to this order was based on a double jeopardy—res judicata—collateral estoppel theory. We requested, and there were filed, additional briefs of the parties directed to the applicability of section 654, Penal Code. We issued an order to show cause. Return thereto and opposing points and authorities have been…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Kellett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Reliable Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Riverside County Department of Public Services v. B.S.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. McCann v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API