Goumas v. K. Karras & Son
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
We agree with what was said in the excellent opinion of the court below as, to the lack of admiralty jurisdiction here. There is no jurisdiction in admiralty except of a maritime contract, and the contract here was not of that character.1 The same considerations apply if the libel be regarded as stating a tort claim: It is not a maritime tort.
Affirmed.
Cory Bros. & Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 51 F.2d 1010, and cases cited; The Princess, D.C., 12 F.2d 808.
As the suit relates to events which occurred after the execution of the contract, admiralty jurisdiction, in any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cory Bros. & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Westfall Larson & Co. v. All-Man-Hubble Tug Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- The PrincessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Garanti Finansal Kiralama A.S. v. Aqua Marine and Trading Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Bergen Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Japan Marine Serv., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Peralta Shipping Corporation v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- P. D. Marchessini & Co., (NEW YORK) Inc. v. Pacific Marine Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Miravalles Compania Naviera, S. S. v. Nissho Co., Ltd., TokyoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.