Coombs v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.
The only questions raised in support of the allegations of the petition for a writ of review herein are questions that involve the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings. We cannot, of course, consider the affidavits in re the stipulation made at the hearing before the referee, as the record of this matter before us cannot be so made up or so changed.
The evidence of the claimant was that he was not injured in a ball game as several witnesses have stated that he had told them. He denied having ever stated this. He further testified that he first noticed the injury to his knee but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re SumidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Walker v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Great Western Power Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Bryant v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Moore Shipbuilding Co. v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
3Cited by10 opinions
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- McDonald's Systems of California, Inc. v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Atlas Coal Corporation v. ScalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.