Legal Opinion

Ocheesee Creamery LLC v. Adam H. Putnam

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 20, 2017No. 16-12049PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACK, Circuit Judge:

Ocheesee Creamery, LLC (the Creamery) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Florida Commissioner of Agriculture and the Chief of the Florida Bureau of Dairy Industry, parties to this lawsuit in their official capacities (together, the State), and the court’s denial of the Creamery’s motion for summary judgment on the question of whether the State improperly forbade the Creamery from selling unfortified skim milk. The Creamery contends the State violated its First Amendment right to free speech by prohibiting the Creamery from using the words “skim…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vugo, Inc. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Retail Digital Network v. Ramona PrietoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Boelter v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. In re Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
  5. Wash. Post v. McManusDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API