Legal Opinion
Trevor Carten v. Kent State University
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 25, 2002No. 98-3150PublishedCited by 212 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOD, District Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Kent State University (“KSU”) and doctors Gary Neiman, Rosemary Dumont, William Canyon, and Danny Wallace appeal the district court’s partial denial of their motion to dismiss. Defendants argue that the district court erred by holding that the Eleventh Amendment did not bar the claims of Plaintiff-Appellee Trevor Carten (“Car-ten”) under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-65, and § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”). Based on new law from the Supreme Court and this circuit, we…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by212 opinions
- Everson v. LeisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Henrietta D. v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Ricardo Diaz v. Michigan Dep't of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Ernst v. RisingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- George Koslow v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania D/B/A Department of Corrections Donald T. Vaughn Phico Services Company Compservices, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.