Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Bohmer

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1975No. Crim. 5418PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHELAN, J. *

Peter Bohmer and Peter Mahone have appealed separately from orders granting each of them probation after they were convicted by verdict in a joint trial of a violation of Penal Code section 587, subdivision 2. The appeals are discussed separately because of the differing grounds advanced for reversal, and because of the difference in the relationship of the facts to each of them. We deal first with Mahone’s appeal.

Penal Code section 587 declares in part:

“Every person who maliciously ...
“1....................
“2. Places any obstruction upon the rails or track of any railroad,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  4. People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hess v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. AtkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. YarberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. People v. V.V.California Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Barren v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. SekonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API