Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 6, 2003No. 01-4155PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we are asked to consider whether the district court erroneously exceeded the scope of our mandate when it dismissed Procter & Gamble’s (“P & G” ’s) claims against defendant Amway Corporation. We reject P & G’s challenges and conclude that the district court properly complied with our mandate.
I. BACKGROUND
The relevant facts and proceedings are fully set out in the district court’s order of June 17, 2001, Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen, 158 F.Supp.2d 1286 (D.Utah 2001) (“Dist.Ct.Order”), and in our previous opinion in this case, Proctor & Gamble v. Haugen, 222…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Lockheed Martin Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Network Solutions, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Smith v. PlatiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Bryson v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Optimum Technologies, Inc. v. Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.