Legal Opinion
Optimum Technologies, Inc. v. Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 22, 2007No. 06-13677PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, plaintiff Optimum Technologies, Inc. (“Optimum”) raises a number of challenges to the district court’s disposition of its action against defendant-appellee Henkel Consumer Adhesives, Inc. (“HCA”). 1 Specifically, Optimum argues that: (1) the district court erred in granting partial summary judgment in favor of HCA on Optimum’s claims of trademark infringement and unfair competition; (2) the district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of HCA on Optimum’s claims of breach of confidential relationship, breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Johnson v. Board of Regents of the University of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Lockheed Martin Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Network Solutions, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Southern Pilot Insurance v. CECS, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
- Church of Scientology of Georgia, Inc. v. City of Sandy SpringsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- Goforit Entertainment, LLC v. Digimedia.Com L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Rain Bird Corp. v. TaylorDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2009
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.