Legal Opinion

Herman v. Admit One

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 6, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, RJ.

However vigorously moral philosophers and others might debate the topic of the cost of admission to the Elysian Fields that is Fenway Park, whether by direct purchase from the Boston Red Sox or through “ticket scalpers,”1 this case addresses but one aspect of the “Anti-Scalping Statute,” G.Lc. 140, §185D.2 The defendant, Admit One Ticket Agency, LLC (“Admit One”), has appealed the judgment against it following a bench trial in which the plaintiff, Colman M. Herman (“Herman”), prevailed on his G.L.c. 93A action against Admit One for having quoted him allegedly exorbitant prices…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ginther v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Sullivan v. Chief Justice for Administration & Management of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. VickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Enos v. Secretary of Environmental AffairsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Commissioner of Revenue v. Cargill, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norfolk Financial Corp. v. MazardMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  2. Board of Trustees of the Sea Grass Village Condominium v. BergquistMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009
  3. Floyd v. OwensMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API