Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Revenue v. Cargill, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1999PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

The question presented is whether a foreign corporation, whose primary business is agriculture, is entitled to the investment tax credit contained in G. L. c. 63, § 31 A, where its operations within the Commonwealth are not primarily agricultural. The Appellate Tax Board (board) ruled that the corporation is entitled to the credit. The board concluded that the § 31A credit is available to those businesses which are “primarily engaged in agriculture” and own property situated within the Commonwealth, whether or not the business activity they conduct within the Commonwealth is agricultural. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Koch v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Commissioner of Revenue v. Houghton Mifflin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. Okerman v. VA Software Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. ROPT Ltd. Partnership v. KatinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Casseus v. E. Bus Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Commonwealth v. Russ R.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API