Legal Opinion

Houston v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1959No. 2311PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle during a period for which his operator’s permit had been revoked. 1 Admitting the revocation of his permit, appellant contends that the evidence did not justify a finding that he operated the vehicle. At trial no testimony was taken and the case was submitted on the following stipulated facts.

An automobile (ownership of which is not disclosed) was parked (standing) facing east, on the north sidewalk of a one-way street; appellant (the only occupant as far as disclosed) was sitting behind the steering wheel and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State v. RuonaMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Richardson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Flournoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. United States v. Robert WestonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Goines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API