Legal Opinion

Goines v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 2009No. 04-CM-532PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ISCOE, Associate Judge,

Superior Court of the District of Columbia:

Appellant was charged by information with a single count of possession of drug paraphernalia D.C.Code § 48-1103(a) (2001). After conducting an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied appellant’s motion to suppress the seizure of the drug paraphernalia at issue. Appellant then entered a conditional guilty plea to the information, thereby preserving her right to appeal the denial of the suppression motion. We review the trial court’s legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error. See Ornelas v. United…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nathan P. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Stanley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Mohamed Fadul v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Funderburk v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Nathan P. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API