Legal Opinion

Baughman v. Meadville Malleable Iron

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1978No. Appeal, No. 1031 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County affirming a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board directing the Commonwealth to pay the entire amount of an award made to one Kenneth Baughman, pursuant to The Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act (Act),1 77 P.S. §1201 et seq. *6The Commonwealth does not challenge Baughman’s entitlement to compensation; it says that his employer, Meadville Malleable Iron Company, should bear 60% of the cost. We disagree and affirm.

Baughman was employed by Meadville…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Montgomery CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Ramondo v. RamondoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. McGorry v. Sterling Supply Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Berks County Trust Co. v. KotzenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Hogg v. Kehoe-Berge Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth, Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. BlankCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Fisher v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Loiacono v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API