Legal Opinion

McGorry v. Sterling Supply Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1934No. Appeal 554PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This workmen’s compensation case is really a dispute between two employers and their respective insurance carriers. While it is being litigated the injured workman, who, both sides admit, is entitled to compensation, is not being paid. There should be some legislative remedy for such a situation, that would give the injured employee the compensation he is admittedly entitled to, while the insurance companies litigate the ultimate responsibility.

Bonner Hauling Company, Inc. which owned certain automobile trucks, by an agreement in writing contracted to furnish two of them…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Byrne v. Henry A. Hitner's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Persing v. Citizens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Robson v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Atherholt v. William Stoddart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jones v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Ellegood v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Wall v. Penn Lumber & Mill WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Baughman v. Meadville Malleable IronCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Doyle v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API