Legal Opinion
In the Interest of A.M.H.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 25, 1994No. 93-1172PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDREASEN, Justice.
The district court, sitting as juvenile court, found A.M.H. a child in need of assistance (CINA) following an adjudicatory hearing. The court placed A.M.H. in the temporary care and custody of the child’s maternal grandparents and under the protective supervision of the Department of Human Services (DHS). Later the court issued an ex parte order for removal of the child from the maternal grandparents. Following a hearing this order was confirmed by the court and temporary custody was transferred to DHS for placement in foster care until the disposi-tional hearing. The court…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Callender v. SkilesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- In the Interest of A.M., Minor Child. Heather Thomas, Subpoenaed WitnessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- In the Interest of A.B. & S.B., Minor Children, S.B., FatherSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- In the Interest of E.H.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- In the Interest of J.D.F.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.