Hansuld v. Lariat Diesel Corp.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[T1] In these consolidated appeals, two adjoining landowners dispute two separate easements. In appeal No. S-09-0206, the Hansulds appeal a district court finding that they do not have an easement for a water line across the property of Lariat Diesel Corporation. We reverse.
[T2] In appeal No. S-09-0207, Lariat Diesel Corporation and its president, Marvin Piel, appeal a district court's ruling declining to require a precise description in metes and bounds of the location of an access easement across the Hansulds' property. We reverse.
FACTS
[T3] We begin with the facts because…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Leithead v. American Colloid Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Metz Beverage Co. v. Wyoming Beverages, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Hansuld v. Lariat Diesel Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Pokorny v. SalasWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miner v. Jesse & Grace, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Christopher Hulme v. Catherine K. O'HareWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Bird v. LampertWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Stuart Goforth v. Jamey FifieldWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Samuel J. Tilden v. Linda J. JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.