Legal Opinion

Hansuld v. Lariat Diesel Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2010No. S-09-0206, S-09-0207PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T1] In these consolidated appeals, two adjoining landowners dispute two separate easements. In appeal No. S-09-0206, the Hansulds appeal a district court finding that they do not have an easement for a water line across the property of Lariat Diesel Corporation. We reverse.

[T2] In appeal No. S-09-0207, Lariat Diesel Corporation and its president, Marvin Piel, appeal a district court's ruling declining to require a precise description in metes and bounds of the location of an access easement across the Hansulds' property. We reverse.

FACTS

[T3] We begin with the facts because…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Leithead v. American Colloid Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Metz Beverage Co. v. Wyoming Beverages, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Hansuld v. Lariat Diesel Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Pokorny v. SalasWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Miner v. Jesse & Grace, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Christopher Hulme v. Catherine K. O'HareWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Bird v. LampertWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Stuart Goforth v. Jamey FifieldWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Samuel J. Tilden v. Linda J. JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API