People v. Travers
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSelarpstein, J.
The defendant was charged in the information with an attempt to commit burglary,— whether in the night-time or daytime is not stated. The degree is not specified in the information. The defendant pleaded “ not guilty.” A trial was had. The jury rendered a verdict of “ guilty as charged,” and the court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment at San Quentin for the term of two years. The defendant appealed from the judgment, and his contention is, that the verdict is a nullity by reason of the omission to specify the degree of crime of which the jury found the defendant guilty.
Burglary is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- McGee v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
- People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- People v. MarquisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. Superior Court (Marks)California Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. Lee Yune ChongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.