Legal Opinion
Ramsey v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 9, 2011No. 2:10cv1305PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
DAVID STEWART CERCONE, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs, Kathleen A. Ramsey and Albert A. Brunn (“Plaintiffs”), are pro-life advocates who seek to distribute pro-life literature on public and private property in the City of Pittsburgh. Plaintiffs contend that Pittsburgh Ordinance § 601.62 (“§ 601.62”) unconstitutionally restricts such distribution, and therefore, filed a complaint seeking a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65 enjoining the City of Pittsburgh (the “City”) from enforcing § 601.62 against them and others,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Geneva College v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Chamber of Commerce for Greater Phila. v. City of Phila.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.