Legal Opinion

Chamber of Commerce for Greater Phila. v. City of Phila.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION No. 17-1548PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goldberg, District Judge.

Responding to the problem of wage inequality for women and minorities, the City of Philadelphia has enacted an ordinance amending Title 9 of The Philadelphia Code to include provisions on wage equity. The ordinance has two parts. First, it prohibits an employer from inquiring about a prospective employee's wage history ("the Inquiry Provision"); and second, it makes it illegal for an employer to rely on wage history "at any stage in the employment process" to determine a salary for an employee ("the Reliance Provision"). The basic premise of the law's prohibitions is…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reilly v. City of HarrisburgDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Victory v. Berks Cnty.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API