Legal Opinion
Murray v. Miller
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 14, 1923No. 3798PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING.
Hill, J.
1. We have carefully examined the motion for rehearing, and also the briefs filed by both parties to the motion, together with the authorities cited; and we are still of the opinion that the judgment of the court below should be affirmed.
In the motion for rehearing it is contended that “in the original case of W. P. Darsey et al. v. J. B. and A. J. Strickland, the plaintiffs are not lien creditors, either by contract or judgment, and for this reason they are not entitled to enjoin their debtor from disposing of property, nor obtain injunction or other extraordinary relief…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Shields v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Bell v. Dawson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Blair v. BraileyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915
- Bangs v. . DuckinfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Commercial National Bank v. BurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Raif v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Pacolet Manufacturing Co. v. Crescent Textiles, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Atlanta Flooring & Insulation Co. v. Oberdorfer Ins. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Ryder Automobile Leasing Co. v. TatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.