Legal Opinion

Endriss v. Belle Isle Ice Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, O. J.

The ice company agreed with plaintiff, who is a brewer, to furnish him with the ice he would require for his brewery during the season of 1880 at $1.75 per ton, or in case of scarcity $2 per ton. The parties proceeded under the contract until May, at which time the ice company refused further performance and so notified the plaintiff. Shortly afterwards the parties arranged that the ice company should furnish ice at $5 per ton; but this was soon modified by reducing the price to $4 per ton. This arrangement it seems was carried out. The plaintiff however brought this suit to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goebel v. LinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schwartzreich v. . Bauman-Basch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. United States Navigation Co. v. Black Diamond Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Smith v. Washburn-Wilson Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. McCabe Const. Co. v. Utah Const. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1912
  5. United States Navigation Co. v. Black Diamond Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API