McDonald v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
Plaintiff Virginia L. McDonald appeals from the trial court’s dismissal by summary judgment of her claims of negligence against the defendant. The main issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously ruled the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur inapplicable.
Facts
The facts are undisputed. Plaintiff entered a store owned by defendant Smitty’s Super Valu, Inc., on November 18, 1983, to drink a cup of coffee. She took a seat on a counter stool perched on a supporting pole. As she sat at the counter for fifteen or twenty minutes, she noticed nothing abnormal about the stool.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Biondini v. Amship Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ralph Martinez, Husband Mary Martinez, Wife v. Asarco Incorporated, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- District of Columbia v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Stephens v. Bashas' Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Cotterhill v. BafileCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- Lohse v. FaultnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.