Legal Opinion

Pruett v. Burr

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1953No. Civ. 4624PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff and respondent brought this action for damages against defendants Robert Burr, Central Valley Cooperative, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as CVC, Estate of J. A. (Tex) Rankin, and R. S. Norswing, copartners doing business as Rankin Aviation Industries, and the defendant and appellant Sherwin-Williams Company, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as appellant). The damage occurred to respondent’s cotton crop and was alleged to have been the proximate result of the negligence of defendants in manufacturing, selling, and spraying, by airplane, the cotton crop of defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. LessardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. GorgolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API