Legal Opinion

Tage E. Pearson v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, an Ohio Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 4, 1964No. 14447_1PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff filed this diversity action to recover from defendant (a corporation) for an alleged breach of an implied contract of employment. The complaint consists of three counts. The trial court dismissed Counts I and III for failure to state a cause upon which relief could be granted, and allowed defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to Count II. From a judgment of dismissal entered October 22, 1963, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff in support of his right to recover advances a novel theory, unknown to the law so far as we are aware. In the concluding paragraph of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. DolanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Price v. Mercury Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  5. Martin v. PlattIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API