Porter v. South Carolina Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Justice:
This is a utility rate case. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
PROCEDURAL POSTURE
The South Carolina Public Service Commission (PSC) reviewed BellSouth Telecommunication’s (BellSouth’s) earnings in 1994, a test year used to determine future rates. Based on that review, PSC adjusted certain revenues and expenses of BellSouth and ordered the company to reduce its future rates by $42.3 million annually. Philip S. Porter (Consumer Advocate) filed a petition for review of PSC’s orders in circuit court. The circuit court affirmed PSC’s orders with the exception of one issue,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- C.A.N. Enterprises, Inc. v. South Carolina Health & Human Services Finance CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Able Communications, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. PichardoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Zia Natural Gas Co. v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Ragin v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Brown v. JamesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.