Legal Opinion

Porter v. South Carolina Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 26, 1998No. 24847PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

This is a utility rate case. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

PROCEDURAL POSTURE

The South Carolina Public Service Commission (PSC) reviewed BellSouth Telecommunication’s (BellSouth’s) earnings in 1994, a test year used to determine future rates. Based on that review, PSC adjusted certain revenues and expenses of BellSouth and ordered the company to reduce its future rates by $42.3 million annually. Philip S. Porter (Consumer Advocate) filed a petition for review of PSC’s orders in circuit court. The circuit court affirmed PSC’s orders with the exception of one issue,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. C.A.N. Enterprises, Inc. v. South Carolina Health & Human Services Finance CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  5. Able Communications, Inc. v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. PichardoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Zia Natural Gas Co. v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ragin v. Porter Hayden Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Brown v. JamesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API