Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Iron Workers Local 118, International Association of Bridge and Structural Iron Workers, Afl-Cio

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1983No. 81-7682PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of an order based on its finding that the Union committed an unfair labor practice (29 U.S.C. §§ 158(b)(1)(A) and (2)) by refusing to refer William Butler to a job at a bargaining unit different from the one in which he had incurred a dues arrearage.

The existence of the unfair labor practice depended upon the Board’s bargaining unit determination. - The Union contends that the bargaining unit issue was neither alleged nor tried during the proceedings, resulting in a due process violation, and that the Board’s determination…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Quality Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. National Labor Relations Board, and Linda Snider and Karin Lehrer, Intervenors v. New York Typographical Union No. 6Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Iron Workers Local 118 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Iron Workers Local 118, International Association of Bridge and Structural Iron Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Waldo F. Kusterns v. National Labor Relations Board, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers Local No. 433, Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Iron Workers Union, Local 433Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API