Legal Opinion

Parks v. Barrowman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9257PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

Complaint for specific performance of a married woman’s parol agreement, made through the agency of her husband, for the conveyance of her real estate. The court-sustained a demurrer, for want of facts, to the complaint, and, upon the refusal of the plaintiffs to amend, gave judgment for the defendants.

Besides alleging the making of the agreement, and showing-that the parties to it were, at the time of making it, married women, the complaint shows the payment of the purchase-money in part, and readiness to pay the remainder, the delivery and taking possession under the contract, the making of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scranton v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Unfried v. HebererIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Behler v. WeyburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Mattox v. HightshueIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Hamar v. MedskerIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Haas v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Levering v. ShockeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Wilhite v. HamrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Knepper v. EggimanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Damron v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API