Ford v. Ford Motor Credit Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentTymkovich, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent because I read the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code, which controls the resolution of this case, as providing a narrower definition of “purchase money security interest” (PMSI) than the majority adopts.
In my view, Kansas law prohibits lenders from using a PMSI to secure a loan for negative equity, even if the loan is bundled with a standard car loan that is itself secured with a PMSI. Therefore, Ford Motor Credit Company does not have a PMSI covering the portion of the Fords’ loan attributable to the $7,200 of negative equity in their truck. And because the hanging…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Raleigh v. Illinois Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.