Deane v. Willamette Bridge Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Multnomah county; E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
This is an action to recover damages for injuries which the plaintiff alléges he sustained while a passenger on a car of the defendant company as the result of its negligence. The facts show that the defendant suffered a default, and claimed under subdivision 2, section 249, Hill’s Code, (edition 1892,) that the court should assess the damages. Upon demand by the plaintiff the court ordered the clerk to call a jury to assess the damages. A jury was thereupon empaneled, who, after hearing the evidence, returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant took no part in the proceeding further…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Allen v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Emma B. C. Thompson v. Richard RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Kendall v. PostOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Raymond v. Danbury & Norwalk RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
3Cited by37 opinions
- De Castro v. Board of Comm'rs of San JuanSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Greist v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Diaz v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.