Legal Opinion

Deane v. Willamette Bridge Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1892PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Multnomah county; E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries which the plaintiff alléges he sustained while a passenger on a car of the defendant company as the result of its negligence. The facts show that the defendant suffered a default, and claimed under subdivision 2, section 249, Hill’s Code, (edition 1892,) that the court should assess the damages. Upon demand by the plaintiff the court ordered the clerk to call a jury to assess the damages. A jury was thereupon empaneled, who, after hearing the evidence, returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant took no part in the proceeding further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Allen v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Emma B. C. Thompson v. Richard RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. Kendall v. PostOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Raymond v. Danbury & Norwalk RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. De Castro v. Board of Comm'rs of San JuanSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Greist v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Diaz v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API