Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel E. Heisman, United States of America v. Michael Ray Radford
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 10, 1974No. 74-1253, 74-1204PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendants Daniel E. Heisman and Michael Ray Radford were indicted and tried by the district court on separate counts alleging violations by Heisman of 18 U.S.C. §§ 471, 473 (counterfeiting and transfer of counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes with intent to defraud) and by Radford of 18 U.S.C. §§ 472, 473 (receiving and possessing counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes with intent to defraud.)
Defendants entered pleas of not guilty .and waived trial by a jury. They were jointly tried by the court. It was stipulated that the evidence in a suppression hearing be…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- McNairy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Bruce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Armando Chaidez, Lilia Silva, and Manuel ChaviraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Howard Dale Bernard, Gordon Rae Childress, Sammy Brice Brock, Roger Lee Bard, Russell Richard CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Mesa RithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.