Legal Opinion

J. H. Tillman Co. v. City of Seaside

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This an action instituted by the J. H. Tillman Company, a corporation, against the city of Seaside, to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the non-payment of warrants issued by the city upon special funds to be raised by the levy and collection of assessments upon the property benefited by the improvement of certain streets in that city.

Before the trial of the case the parties stipulated that the facts and the law in each of the twenty-five separate causes of action were substantially the same; that there should be tried before the court, without the intervention of a jury, the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. New Orleans v. WarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Little v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. North Pacific Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. East PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1886

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. McGrath v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Angleró v. Municipality of FajardoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
  5. Angleró v. Municipio de FajardoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API