Legal Opinion

North Pacific Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. East Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1886PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Multnomah County. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The respondent is a private corporation, and the appellant a municipal corporation. The former began an action in the lower court against the latter, to recover the contract price for building a certain bridge, or elevated roadway, in said city. The city in the outset contracted with one J. E. Bennett to do the work, and the respondent alleged in its complaint that Bennett, after furnishing materials and performing labor, assigned his claim to the respondent; that the appellant, the city, recognized the respondeút as a party to the contract in the place of Bennett, and that thereafter the…

2Cited by37 opinions

  1. German-American Savings Bank v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Little v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Commercial National Bank v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Livesley v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Pine Tree Lumber Co. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API