Legal Opinion
Hylind v. Xerox Corporation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 17, 2010No. Civil No.: PJM 03-116PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.
I.Introduction
Eileen Hylind won a jury verdict against Xerox Corporation on claims of sexual discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and the jury awarded her compensatory damages, subsequently capped at the statutory maximum of $300,000. The Court now addresses various post-trial motions of the parties.
Hylind has filed:
1) A Motion for Economic Damages, claiming entitlement to back pay and front pay, arguing that she sustained disabling migraine headaches and became unable to work as a result of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rovilma Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. Mountainview Cutters, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016
- Hylind v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mid-American Specialties, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Owen v. Rutherford Supply CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Sourgoutsis v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.